RE: netscape vs. mozilla


Subject: RE: netscape vs. mozilla
From: Joakim Ryden (jo@our-own.net)
Date: Thu Aug 02 2001 - 22:49:32 MDT


Really? Shockwave appears to be working in both konqueror and mozilla
for me...

--Jo

On 03 Aug 2001 10:42:39 +1000, Jason Gan wrote:
> I like Mozilla 0.9.2, however the new "User" Themes from netscape.com don't
> work (Crashes browser and config needs to be deleted). Also shockwave
> doesn't work!!! Shockwave also doesn't work for Konqueror! (x2!)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Frankel [mailto:leknarf@pacbell.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 August 2001 2:52 PM
> To: yellowdog-general
> Subject: netscape vs. mozilla
>
>
>
> I thought I'd take mozilla for a spin around the
> block, especially after reading about netscape's
> security short-comings. I could get used to it.
> The layout is essentially the same as netscape's;
> but somehow feels better. Maybe it's just the
> bigger default font and larger buttons ;)
>
> But I don't think I could get used to the constant
> crashing and burning. I've used mozilla for an
> afternoon and already I've had to put it down with
> a kill -9 more than once; clean its dumped core;
> and stressed and fussed with windows that have their
> title bars on the side -- the side that falls off
> my screen! (What's the Sawfish equivalent of the Irix
> 4Dwm "alt-F7-MMB:" sort of a grab-the-window-by-the-ear
> and move it where I want without havving to click
> the title bar?)
>
> Maybe what I should really do is just use mozilla to
> browse with. It's probably good at that. Then I'll
> need to learn how to setup procmail and migrate back
> to pine for email.
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Thu Aug 02 2001 - 20:48:22 MDT