Subject: RE: Non Mozilla web browsers?
From: Jason Gan (jason@hspace.net)
Date: Sun Jul 01 2001 - 19:04:08 MDT
I prefer Konqueror. Only two deficiencies in the browser at the moment:
(1) KHTML engine is slow when opening up a new window
(2) Flash plug-in doesn't work
And also:
(3) Configuration options aren't all there (eg. I can't tell it to mask
itself as an IE5 browser to web servers, so
server-side programming languages identify it as an unsupported browser when
really it should be supported because it is the same as IE.)
-----Original Message-----
From: r may [mailto:mayro@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 3:34 AM
To: yellowdog-general@lists.yellowdoglinux.com
Subject: Re: Non Mozilla web browsers?
looks like its mozilla and lynx for me then. Any tips on how I can improve
mozillas performance? I m ainly want it to load pages faster than it has
been. I know it can since IE on mac loads stuff really fast while mozilla
on mac or linux is sluggish.
robert
On Sun, 01 Jul 2001 15:48:39 +0200
Graham Leggett <minfrin@sharp.fm> wrote:
> r may wrote:
>
> > Ok so I'm starting to get tired of new web-browsers using mozilla.
> > Are there any browsers that are fast, complete (can handle stuff
> > like java, etc), and just browsers (no IM, Mail, or html editors)
> > that are not mozilla based?
>
> I was quite impressed by the Nautilus file manager and it's ability to
> view embedded webpages. It's just a browser - no extra addon bars or any
> other nonsense. It uses Mozilla to do the work, which means that most
> websites should work sortof...
>
> Regards,
> Graham
> --
> -----------------------------------------
> minfrin@sharp.fm "There's a moon
> over Bourbon Street
> tonight..."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Sun Jul 01 2001 - 18:13:07 MDT