Subject: Re: YDL vs. MacOS X
From: Joe (joerex@pacbell.net)
Date: Mon Jul 02 2001 - 09:42:50 MDT
First of all, I don't think people really care whether you approve of them
using all three OSes on one machine.
Second, I wonder how well does X work under MacOS X? I'd be interested to
try to make that work so I could compile functional programs.
Joe
on 7/2/01 6:49 AM, Chris Ruprecht at chrup999@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
Just a thought: I read a few posts of people trying to run MacOS Classic,
MacOS X and YDL on the same machine in different partitions. My Question is:
What's the point?
If you're running MacOS X, you're already running a UNIX OS which gives you
most of the tools YDL gives you as well. The stuff you don't have under X,
you can download and compile yourself.
I understand that people want to run YDL on their legacy hardware which is
not supported by OS X or they don't like the new OS and want to run some
form of UNIX. But running both flavors on the same machine just doesn't make
sense to me. The argument "because I can" just doesn't cut it ;).
I'm running YDL on my Pismo because I want to run UNIX but OS X is just too
big and too clumsy an OS to run within 256 MB. I might give it another try,
specially since I ordered a 512 MB SODIMM and I guess 768 MB should be
sufficient to run OS X (for a few days). But: What can I do under OS X, I
can not do under YDL 2.0 and vice versa? Is there an easy answer to that?
Best regards,
Chris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Mon Jul 02 2001 - 08:44:24 MDT