Re: MacOS 9.1 to X.1 Upgrade ¿dangerous?.


Subject: Re: MacOS 9.1 to X.1 Upgrade ¿dangerous?.
From: dano (dano@well.com)
Date: Thu Nov 29 2001 - 22:54:47 MST


I work with X 10.1 and X 10.1 Server on a daily basis and agree that
it is not as productive as 9.2.1 or 9.1. I get more work done faster
because there is much s/w available for 9.x.

X is too slow on anything PPC slower than 533MHz.

X Server is a pain, though not a pita.

At 4:18 PM -0500 on 11/29/01, Christopher Murtagh wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Jose M. wrote:
>>I'm thinking about upgrading MacOS, but, could this process damage my
>>current situation? do I need to take any special measure??.
>
> From my most recent experiences with MacOS, going from 9.2.1 to X.1 is a
>downgrade, not an upgrade. The system is *way* too slow and a major pain
>in the ass go get simple things like nfs working in a predictable fashion.
>If you don't need it, chances are you are better off without it (for now,
>anyway).

-- 
If the government wants us to obey the law
it should set a better example.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Thu Nov 29 2001 - 23:26:13 MST