Subject: RE: Reply-To: Setting
From: Stefan Schneider (stefan.schneider@comsat.com.ve)
Date: Tue Oct 03 2000 - 18:14:57 MDT
That would be the LinuxCE mailing list I guess :) IMHO, I think the list is
fine as it is, if the noise/signal ratio of this list is going down as some
have pointed out the best bet would be have the admin publish a set of
guidelines and whoever doesn't want to follow them is graciously invited to
leave... funny how democracy always require some set of rules and most
people forget them in a second. Rules of netiquette apply EVEN in technical
mailing lists.
Can we please stop it here and move on?
Best regards to all
Stefan
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Cole <greyleaf@yggdrasill.net>
To: <yellowdog-general@lists.yellowdoglinux.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: Reply-To: Setting
> I think that this is one of those "the grass is greener on the other side"
> things. I am also on some lists that don't use the Reply-To: back to the
> list. People are constantly complaining about replies not being sent to
the
> list and blaming it on the fact that the admin doesn't use Reply-To ;)
>
> Jim
>
> Hollis R Blanchard's bits of Tue, 3 Oct 2000 translated to:
>
> >On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Josh Smith wrote:
> >
> >> I personally think that setting Reply-To: to the list is a bad idea.
> >
> >I agree.
> >
> >-Hollis
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Wed Oct 04 2000 - 08:18:54 MDT