Subject: Re: Good tar.gz app
From: Jeff Tillwick (jeffat00@bellsouth.net)
Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 18:04:52 MST
when compiling a program I use the configure command, then the make command,
then the make install command. After that there is nothing that specifies
where the program is actually installed to. As for x11 or KDE versions I
install, the command to open the program doesn't appear to work either in
the shell nor the command line in KDE
also i was told that i386, i486 and other pc tar.gz files could be converted
for PPC. is this really possible and if so, how???
> If a program requires just a binary file to run (i.e. no included libraries
> etc.) once you untar and ungzip it, you can just move the binary to /bin, or
> /usr/bin, somewhere in your path. If it does require certain files to placed
> somewhere in the system, then most people put INSTALL shell scripts with
> them.. and they will do the actual installation for you.
>
> as for the shell being "confusing and lame"... this IS Linux.. this IS a
> Unix OS. Yes there are GUIs to make some things easier to do (file
> management, and graphical programs) but the shell is still Unix's main
> interface.. you can't separate Unix from the shell, it is no longer Unix
> then.
>
> As for the programs not running.. try going
>
> cd <path to compiled program>
> ../<program name>
>
> I would recommend reading the man pages for tar, gzip and gunzip, or buying
> a book about Linux. You can't not use the shell. When I first used Linux in
> 1997, it took me a month to get used to the shell, and ever since then..
> it's earned my respect in the computing world.
> ---------------------------------------
> "The knack to flying is learning how to
> throw yourself at the ground and miss."
>
>> From "Life the Universe and Everything"
> by Douglas Adams
>
> Robert Fout
> MacOS Guru and MkLinux/Yellowdog Linux User
> rfout@damien.edu
> http://osx.damien.edu/rfout/
> ICQ# 48433406
>
>> From: Jeff Tillwick <jeffat00@bellsouth.net>
>> Reply-To: yellowdog-general@lists.yellowdoglinux.com
>> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 23:19:55 -0500
>> To: <yellowdog-general@lists.yellowdoglinux.com>
>> Subject: Re: Good tar.gz app
>>
>> Oh, where do i begin! Lets see, first off, Archiver does indeed decompress
>> tar.gz files, yet i have yet to see its ability to compile and correctly
>> install the program
>>
>> Secondly, using the shell is so confusing and lame, if we have a graphical
>> interface environment, why not take advantage of it, i compiled and
>> installed kicq and klicq and xawtv in the shell and as far as i can tell, i
>> did it correctly, yet the programs wont load up and the commands do
>> absolutely nothing both and the command line and in the terminal.
>>
>>> and what's wrong with with opening a terminal up and using the shell?
>>> ---------------------------------------
>>> "The knack to flying is learning how to
>>> throw yourself at the ground and miss."
>>>
>>>> From "Life the Universe and Everything"
>>> by Douglas Adams
>>>
>>> Robert Fout
>>> MacOS Guru and MkLinux/Yellowdog Linux User
>>> rfout@damien.edu
>>> http://osx.damien.edu/rfout/
>>> ICQ# 48433406
>>>
>>>> From: Stew Benedict <stewb@earthlink.net>
>>>> Reply-To: yellowdog-general@lists.yellowdoglinux.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 22:53:05 -0500 (EST)
>>>> To: yellowdog-general@lists.yellowdoglinux.com
>>>> Subject: Re: Good tar.gz app
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What's wrong with the KDE archiver?
>>>>
>>>> Stew Benedict
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Jeff Tillwick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> i have a mission for any programmer out
>>>> there:
>>>>>
>>>>> Write a program for kde that compiles and installs tar.gz files easily and
>>>>> completely without going through the shell
>>>>>
>>>>> AND FOR PPC yellow dog linux
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Wed Mar 01 2000 - 00:07:11 MST