Re: Linux (YDL) vs. Linux (Intel flavours)


Subject: Re: Linux (YDL) vs. Linux (Intel flavours)
From: Paul J. Lucas (pauljlucas@mac.com)
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 08:15:33 MST


On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Eric D. wrote:

> How do the Intel builds compare to the YDL for Mac (or the other Linuxes for
> Mac)? I presume there may be flavours that are simpler and have a more
> refined user interfaces than YDL or are they all effectively the same?

        The only things distros do is repackage what other people have
        written, write their own installers, and maybe mess around with
        files in /etc. That's pretty much it. They do not make
        kernels or UIs.

        This seems to be the hardest thing for newbies to grasp. YDL
        is *not* as OS. There is just one Linux kernel (modulo PPC
        patches that people like Ben H. and Paul Mackerras do, but even
        these are not YDL-specific: they are PPC specific and they
        eventually get incorporated into the main Linux source tree).
        XFree86 (modulo support for your particular graphics card),
        WindowMaker, AfterStep, Gnome, KDE, etc, are all *exactly* the
        same.

        - Paul



This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Thu Mar 14 2002 - 08:30:02 MST