Subject: Re: YDL 2.1 Question
From: Carl Potter (carl@psychiatrykills.com)
Date: Fri Nov 09 2001 - 22:09:59 MST
In general, yes.
I have noticed that 2.1 took NO fiddling to get up and going on both my
iBook and 7200. 2.0 took SOME fiddling.
Afterall .....a bump in version should usually mean an increase in
quality/functionality :) This is true for 2.1 so far.
Juha Västi wrote:
> >How should we know? Probably not very many people out there have
> >your machine to test on. Theoretically the kernel should work on
> >your machine (see http://penguinppc.org/projects/hw/clones.shtml),
> >but there is no way to be certain without trying.
> >
> >Juha Västi wrote:
> >
> >>>Hello, I'd just want to know if 2.1 supports more hardware than 2.0
> >>>
> >>>Thanks for the possible help (*hoping for replies*)
> >>
> >>
> >>Please, I don't want to spam or be annoying but could someone
> >>answer the question 'Is hardware compatibility improved in YDL 2.1'
> >>?
> >>
>
> Thanks for the answer, but although I did post my stats there, I was
> asking for a more general answer (if hardware compatibility has been
> improved), so I'm going to *SNIP* the stats from the post away so
> people don't get confused.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Fri Nov 09 2001 - 22:21:45 MST