Re: bash2

Subject: Re: bash2
From: Jag (agrajag@linuxpower.org)
Date: Wed Aug 09 2000 - 08:19:53 MDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Adam Oliner: "Re: Linux on Expansion Bay Drive"
• Previous message: Dan Burcaw: "Re: yup stopped working: libbfd needed"
• In reply to: Hollis Blanchard: "Re: bash2"
• Next in thread: Michael A. Peters: "Re: bash2"
• Reply: Jag: "Re: bash2"

On Wed, 09 Aug 2000, Hollis Blanchard wrote:

> So while I don't disagree with you (it does make sense to me to keep .bashrc
> with the bash rpm) I suspect the original problem lies with RedHat. Of
> course, I haven't seen the RH7 beta yet, so it may have been addressed.

[agrajag@devera skel]$ cat /etc/issue

Red Hat Linux release 6.9.5 (Pinstripe)
Kernel 2.2.16-17 on an i686

[agrajag@devera skel]$ pwd
/etc/skel
[agrajag@devera skel]$ rpm -qf .bashrc
bash-2.04-8
[agrajag@devera skel]$

Appears to be fixed in the beta :)
And I agree, this probablly all originated with the way Red Hat did it.

Jag

• Next message: Adam Oliner: "Re: Linux on Expansion Bay Drive"
• Previous message: Dan Burcaw: "Re: yup stopped working: libbfd needed"
• In reply to: Hollis Blanchard: "Re: bash2"
• Next in thread: Michael A. Peters: "Re: bash2"
• Reply: Jag: "Re: bash2"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Wed Aug 09 2000 - 08:27:13 MDT